Meanin of Life

Eric Boggs 10/29/2012 Martin Philosophy The importation of livelihood has been debated among musical compositiony good deal end-to-end history. Different theories have been apply to quiz and explain what our endeavor is in this conduct. Ive al trends heard from my pargonnts that sustainment is in like manner short for regrets, and that there will be good and bad days. However what is it that mountain strive for in bread and butter? In human beings there is no h geniusst answer to this simple question. Some tidy sum strive for living life in the moment which philosopher Baggini can agree with.Others bring down pietism as an important way to lead their lifes as Pojman could agree with. Some like Camus desire its humanly impossible to pose the inwardness of life. Ultimately people must find it in themselves as to their office in this life. Julian Baggini speaks of our innovation in this life that is more sympathetic than Camus or Pojman. Baggini has a teleologic al sensible horizon on life sloppeding our aim is looking in advance to approaching goals and objectives. However Baggini doesnt mean that our purpose is to succeed presently avoiding soul-to-person happiness to achieve a repair future.An example he mentions is when people articulate I can die elated at a time because a lifetime fulfillment has been achieved. What is the purpose of life by and by achieving a lifelong goal, and in reality Baggini fundamentally says Why non. There is cypher to live for and the feeling of emptiness settles in as nonhing will return that lifelong achievement. Baginni says the person who sacrifices too much(prenominal) enjoyment of life to serve the purpose of future wealth and security is therefrom making the mistake of overestimating the extent to which is future life will be wagerer than the one he could have now.Most people strive for a loaded and fashionable lifestyle, but at what cost is someone willing to make for it. Baggi ni says what approximately this rich lifestyle is different than a person who doesnt have these luxuries. honest because someone has a lot of real(a) happiness doesnt mean that person is happier. In my view I take Baggini has the confine view on the heart of life because living life for a nice future musical composition taking advantages of lifes luxuries presently is a kernelful way to live.Personally Im not a deeply unearthly person, but I do hunch over people who value religion and coordinated their views in their daily actions. Pojman argues that religion specifically theistic religion gives meaning to life. Pojman begins by defining what it means to be handsome and self-directed he refers existence autonomous as creation self-governed or exemption to make your own choices. Pojman points bulge self-sufficiency is good if it serves a purpose. Whether it is doing good or bad it still serves a purpose towards life. Pojman pointed out to signalise points an agnos tic women had mentioned to him in the past.One being it is more important to be unloosen than autonomous, and the second point being Religion provides a grand meaning or purpose to live, but it does not allow humans to be free or autonomous according to the atheist women. Pojman argues freedom cant be understood apart from the notion of purposiveness. Pojman states in recite to be free one has to Act A, when you want to, in order to reach some goal G. However Pojman looked into the bigger picture as to what this atheist woman was stating. Pojman essentially contradicts her command with reasoning.Pojman says freedom and autonomy are a great deal distant from each other, but in theism it is bound together. Pojman way of defining the purpose of life wasnt as appealing to me as Baggini. Religion does play a role in aspects of peoples lives just not enough in my opinion for it to matter. Camus had different views from Pojman and Baggini because he believed life was absurd and meanin gless. Suicide was a heavy(p) idea that Camus commonly spoke of. Camus states that self-annihilation was implying you were confessing that its not worth the trouble.He used an example of a man who killed himself atomic number 23 years after his daughter had passed away. The man simply was to emotionally instable to return to his general behaviors. Camus had also mentioned absurdity which he specify a split in a man and his overall life. Camus explained that daily turning like working several hours a week and doing the same thing day-by-day will eventually come to a halt. The question is why? Why do eventually want things to change after having a stable routine life.Camus says this is fatigue which possibly leads to the idea of felo-de-se. If something abruptly changes such(prenominal) as death there are two options he implies. One being able to recover what is lost, or the other is suicide. He uses the example of Sisyphus which is a graven image that was condemned to the u nderworld. Sisyphus pushes a huge stone to the spend of this mountain only to roll sticker to the bottom to do the process from start. Camus implies that this is a usual aspect in peoples lives where being stable and having a routine is sustaining until it collapses.I feel Camus implies what is the point of living such a life if its inevitable that tragedy will plausibly occur. Ive had friends commit suicide and Ive have often wondered if there was anything I could have done about. In reality I looked at it from Camus point of view as it provided them a way out and essentially tell me life is not worth living. There in so plan that says how one should live, but but a reason to find a way to live. Baggini viewed life mostly in the moment as long as happiness and future endeavors were equilibrate.Pojman had the idea that religion played an important role in ones life while Camus thought in the end suicide seemed to be the right choice if life became too difficult. Baggini in my o pinion had the closet way in interpreting the purpose of life. Baggini explains that happiness in the present with balanced goals in the future should be a way someone should live. I for sure dont want to hold in ten years to live a rich lifestyle while family and friends trip away. Life is what one makes it, but the key is finding out what purpose do people find it.